Cynthia Curl
Kai Elgethun
Cole Fitzpatrick
Vince Hebert
John Kissel
Chengsheng Lu
Jaya Ramaprasad
Rene Showlund-Irish
Ming Tsai
Sarah Weppner
Michael Yost
NIOSH Agricultural Centers Program
EPA STAR Grant Program
EPA/NIEHS Center for Child Health Risks Research
Dept of Environmental and Occupational Health Sciences
Environmental Exposure Assessment
- Measure environmental concentrations
- Characterize time-location and personal activities
- Exposure and dose modeling
Biological Monitoring Approaches
-
Pesticide metabolites in urine
- Pesticides in body fluids (blood, saliva)
- Biomarkers of effect (e.g., cholinesterase)
Koch et al. Environ Health Perspect 110:829-33, 2002
-
Agricultural community in E. Washington state
- OP pesticide exposure monitored in 44 preschool children for one year
- Spot urine samples collected on a bi-weekly basis
- Pesticide spray patterns documented by cooperative extension
- Para-occupational and proximity factors not significant predictors
(Arrows indicate months of OP pesticides spraying)
(Arrows indicate months of OP pesticides spraying)
et al., Environ Health Perspect 111:377-382 (2003)
-
Recruitment from two Seattle grocery
stores
- 39 Pre-school children (2-5 yrs old)
- 3-day diet log kept by parents
- 24 hour urine sample
- Children classified by consumption of
organic or conventional produce
- Residential pesticide use minimal
Median (µmol/L)
|
Dimethyl |
Diethyl |
Conventional |
0.17 |
0.02 |
Organic |
0.03 |
0.02 |
et al., J Toxicol Environ Health 53:283-92 (1998)
- Intracellular passive diffusion determines appearance of pesticides in saliva
-
Lipid solubility
- Degree of ionization (pKa)
- Molecular weight
- Protein binding
- Rodent selected as model animal
- Pesticide administration through i.v. injection, skin or gavage (oral) ingestion
- Simultaneous arterial blood and saliva collection
Solid line indicates the model fit using a two-compartment model
-
Both atrazine and diazinon excreted into saliva,
- Salivary excretion of atrazine and diazinon unaffected by the dose, route of administration or salivary flow rate,
- Significant correlation of atrazine and diazinon concentration in saliva and plasma samples
- Findings suggest that salivary concentrations can be used to predict plasma levels for both pesticides.
in collaboration with the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health Denovan
et al., Environ Health Perspect 73:457-462
- Evaluate sampling protocol for saliva
collection in the field
- Measure atrazine concentrations in saliva
for a cohort of herbicide applicators
-
Baseline (3 months prior to application)
- 15 applicators
- Sampled every fourth day; 103 events
- Sampling schedule included post-shift, before bed, and next morning samples
- Urine, hand wash, skin patches collected by NIOSH
-
Saliva sampling is practical in the field
- Saliva captures the trends of atrazine exposure and elimination in the body
- Urine data confirmed the exposure even without atrazine spraying in the field
- Lack of plasma samples to confirm the validity of saliva biomonitoring
Human exposure studies
-
Children’s dietary study, Seattle
- Farm worker family study, Nicaragua
- Human controlled-exposure study (UC Davis)
Explore other pesticides
-
US EPA STAR Grant R828606 2001 - 2004
- US EPA STAR Grant R829364 2002 - 2006
- Dr. Dana Barr, CDC Laboratory National Center for Environmental Health
Spray Drift Modeling Studies
- Human exposure not measured directly
Spray Drift Incident Studies
- Exposure estimated after-the-fact
Washington Aerial Spray Drift Study
- Measure and model spray event
- Measure community and residential air and surface levels
- Measure and model children’s activities and exposures
Central Washington State
- Dry summer climate
- Flat topography
Aerial Applications on Potatoes
- 1-2 times per season every third season
- Aerial applications -- fixed wing aircraft
Methamidophos
- Highly toxic organophosphorus insecticide (Toxicity I)
- Monitor-4™ 40% emulsifiable concentrate formulation
- 283 hectares treated @ 1.1 kg a.i. per hectare (1 lb/acre)
Agricultural Community
- Surrounded by potato,
corn, wheat fields
- Single-family residences,
recreational facilities
Children
-
Parents are farmworkers
- Live in community year round
- Ages 3-11
- 4 male, 4 female
Informed consent/assent obtained from all parents and children
Deposition Samples
-
Silica gel chromatography plates
Surface Wipes
-
Playground equipment
- Toys and apples
- Indoor surfaces
Children’s Hands
Children’s Activities
-
Global positioning system - personal activity loggers
Air Samples, Housedust, Urine samples
Elgethun et al., Environ Health Perspect 111:115-122 (2003)
Clothing does not block reception
- Well controlled aerial application
- Levels at field boundary 1,000X greater than off-target
- Low levels on surfaces in community (Good News!)
- Measurable residues on play equipment and outdoor toys
- No detectable residues on indoor surfaces
- Children contact residues on spray and post-spray days
-
Highest child hand exposure = 300 ng
- Highest child cumulative exposure (2 days) = 790 ng
- Child activities an important component of exposure analysis
- 8-fold difference between high and low child exposures
- Develop dispersion models for vapors and particles
- Estimate dermal contact via deposition modeling and children’s activities
- Estimate respiratory exposure via air modeling and children’s activities
- Mass balance analysis of aggregate exposure and biological monitoring
- Risk analysis and communication to agricultural community
Disclaimer and Reproduction Information: Information in
NASD does not represent NIOSH policy. Information included in
NASD appears by permission of the author and/or copyright holder.
More