Measuring Pesticide Exposure


Novel Assessment Methods for Agricultural Producers, Workers and their Families



Contributors and Support

Cynthia Curl
Kai Elgethun
Cole Fitzpatrick
Vince Hebert
John Kissel
Chengsheng Lu
Jaya Ramaprasad
Rene Showlund-Irish
Ming Tsai
Sarah Weppner
Michael Yost
NIOSH Agricultural Centers Program
EPA STAR Grant Program
EPA/NIEHS Center for Child Health Risks Research
Dept of Environmental and Occupational Health Sciences

Pesticide Exposure Assessment

Environmental Exposure Assessment

  • Measure environmental concentrations
  • Characterize time-location and personal activities
  • Exposure and dose modeling
Biological Monitoring Approaches
  • Pesticide metabolites in urine
  • Pesticides in body fluids (blood, saliva)
  • Biomarkers of effect (e.g., cholinesterase)
Biological Monitoring Studies



Longitudinal Biomonitoring Study in an Agricultural Community

Koch et al. Environ Health Perspect 110:829-33, 2002
  • Agricultural community in E. Washington state
  • OP pesticide exposure monitored in 44 preschool children for one year
  • Spot urine samples collected on a bi-weekly basis
  • Pesticide spray patterns documented by cooperative extension
  • Para-occupational and proximity factors not significant predictors
Geometric Means (µmol/L) and 95% C.I.for diethyl OP Pesticide Metabolite Concentrations by Sampling Months

(Arrows indicate months of OP pesticides spraying)



Geometric Means (µmol/L) and 95% C.I. for dimethyl OP Pesticide Metabolite Concentrations by Sampling Months

(Arrows indicate months of OP pesticides spraying)



Dietary Exposure to OP Pesticides Curl

et al., Environ Health Perspect 111:377-382 (2003)
  • Recruitment from two Seattle grocery stores
  • 39 Pre-school children (2-5 yrs old)
  • 3-day diet log kept by parents
  • 24 hour urine sample
  • Children classified by consumption of organic or conventional produce
  • Residential pesticide use minimal
Dialkylphosphate Concentrations in Children’s Urine Samples

Median (µmol/L)

  Dimethyl Diethyl
Conventional 0.17 0.02
Organic 0.03 0.02

Dimethyl metabolites



Saliva Studies in Animals Lu

et al., J Toxicol Environ Health 53:283-92 (1998)

  • Intracellular passive diffusion determines appearance of pesticides in saliva
    • Lipid solubility
    • Degree of ionization (pKa)
    • Molecular weight
    • Protein binding
  • Rodent selected as model animal
  • Pesticide administration through i.v. injection, skin or gavage (oral) ingestion
  • Simultaneous arterial blood and saliva collection

Concentration-time profiles of atrazine following gastric administration in rats



Regression model for saliva and plasma atrazine concentrations following i.v. and gastric administration in rats



Observed and predicted saliva and plasma concentration-time profiles for diazinon in rats after I.V. bolus injection of 1 mg/kg diazinon



Solid line indicates the model fit using a two-compartment model

Correlation of salivary and plasma concentrations of diazinon following I.V. bolus injection in rats




Conclusions from Animal Studies Conclusions from Animal Studies
  • Both atrazine and diazinon excreted into saliva,
  • Salivary excretion of atrazine and diazinon unaffected by the dose, route of administration or salivary flow rate,
  • Significant correlation of atrazine and diazinon concentration in saliva and plasma samples
  • Findings suggest that salivary concentrations can be used to predict plasma levels for both pesticides.
Preliminary Survey of Atrazine Exposure Among Herbicide Applicators

in collaboration with the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health Denovan
et al., Environ Health Perspect 73:457-462
  • Evaluate sampling protocol for saliva collection in the field
  • Measure atrazine concentrations in saliva for a cohort of herbicide applicators
Study Design
  • Baseline (3 months prior to application)
  • 15 applicators
  • Sampled every fourth day; 103 events
  • Sampling schedule included post-shift, before bed, and next morning samples
  • Urine, hand wash, skin patches collected by NIOSH
SalivetteTM



Worker #7



Worker #1



Profiles of median salivary concentrations of atrazine for custom herbicide applicators




Conclusions from Field Study Conclusions from Field Study
  • Saliva sampling is practical in the field
  • Saliva captures the trends of atrazine exposure and elimination in the body
  • Urine data confirmed the exposure even without atrazine spraying in the field
  • Lack of plasma samples to confirm the validity of saliva biomonitoring
On-going Saliva On-going Saliva Biomonitoring Biomonitoring Studies

Human exposure studies
  • Children’s dietary study, Seattle
  • Farm worker family study, Nicaragua
  • Human controlled-exposure study (UC Davis)
Explore other pesticides
  • Chlorpyrifos
  • Permethrin
Acknowledgments
  • US EPA STAR Grant R828606 2001 - 2004
  • US EPA STAR Grant R829364 2002 - 2006
  • Dr. Dana Barr, CDC Laboratory National Center for Environmental Health
Environmental Monitoring Studies



Spray Drift Studies

Spray Drift Modeling Studies
  • Human exposure not measured directly
Spray Drift Incident Studies
  • Exposure estimated after-the-fact
Washington Aerial Spray Drift Study
  • Measure and model spray event
  • Measure community and residential air and surface levels
  • Measure and model children’s activities and exposures
Application Site



Central Washington State
  • Dry summer climate
  • Flat topography
Aerial Applications on Potatoes
  • 1-2 times per season every third season
  • Aerial applications -- fixed wing aircraft
Methamidophos
  • Highly toxic organophosphorus insecticide (Toxicity I)
  • Monitor-4™ 40% emulsifiable concentrate formulation
  • 283 hectares treated @ 1.1 kg a.i. per hectare (1 lb/acre)
Study Site and Population

Agricultural Community
  • Surrounded by potato, corn, wheat fields
  • Single-family residences, recreational facilities
Children
  • Parents are farmworkers
  • Live in community year round
  • Ages 3-11
  • 4 male, 4 female


Informed consent/assent obtained from all parents and children

Recruitment Poster



Sampling Procedures



Deposition Samples
  • Silica gel chromatography plates
Surface Wipes
  • Playground equipment
  • Toys and apples
  • Indoor surfaces
Children’s Hands
  • Isopropanol wipes
Children’s Activities
  • Global positioning system - personal activity loggers
Air Samples, Housedust, Urine samples

GPS Personal Acquisition Logger (GPS-PAL) (Entertech)




GPS-PALS Unit

Elgethun et al., Environ Health Perspect 111:115-122 (2003)



Clothing does not block reception

Key Findings

  • Well controlled aerial application
    • Levels at field boundary 1,000X greater than off-target
  • Low levels on surfaces in community (Good News!)
    • Measurable residues on play equipment and outdoor toys
    • No detectable residues on indoor surfaces
  • Children contact residues on spray and post-spray days
    • Highest child hand exposure = 300 ng
    • Highest child cumulative exposure (2 days) = 790 ng
  • Child activities an important component of exposure analysis
    • 8-fold difference between high and low child exposures
Work in Progress

  • Develop dispersion models for vapors and particles
  • Estimate dermal contact via deposition modeling and children’s activities
  • Estimate respiratory exposure via air modeling and children’s activities
  • Mass balance analysis of aggregate exposure and biological monitoring
  • Risk analysis and communication to agricultural community


Disclaimer and Reproduction Information: Information in NASD does not represent NIOSH policy. Information included in NASD appears by permission of the author and/or copyright holder. More

BACK TO TOP